openai (gpt-5-nano-2025-08-07) · not yet verifiable · 70%

The claim asserts existence of a secret global committee that has fixed every election since 1990. There is no credible public evidence supporting this, and the claim is extraordinary; without verifiable evidence, its truth cannot be determined at this time.

Key points: No credible sources verify a secret global committee fixing elections since 1990. | Election results are determined by diverse, publicly documented processes in each jurisdiction; rampant conspiracy claims lack verifiable proof. | Extraordinary claims require robust evidence; absence of such evidence does not prove false, but current verifiable information does not support the claim.

anthropic (claude-haiku-4-5-20251001) · contradicted · 98%

The claim that a secret global committee has fixed every election result since 1990 is contradicted by extensive evidence of electoral diversity, contested outcomes, unexpected results, and the logistical implausibility of such a conspiracy.

Key points: Numerous elections since 1990 have produced genuinely surprising outcomes that contradict a predetermined fixed schedule (e.g., 2016 US presidential election, Brexit referendum, various unexpected upsets worldwide) | Election results show high variability across different regions, countries, and systems, inconsistent with centralized control | Millions of people participate in election administration globally with competing interests; a unified conspiracy maintaining secrecy across all jurisdictions lacks credible mechanism | Post-election audits, recounts, and litigation in various countries have confirmed election integrity without uncovering evidence of global manipulation | No credible evidence or documentation of such a committee has ever emerged despite extensive investigation by journalists, academics, and political opponents | The logistical challenge of controlling outcomes across different electoral systems, voting technologies, and legal frameworks simultaneously is implausible

Limitations: Cannot absolutely prove a negative (absence of a hidden conspiracy) | Unfalsifiable claims are inherently difficult to definitively refute | Some may interpret ambiguous election outcomes as evidence of manipulation rather than legitimate competition

google (gemini-2.5-flash-lite) · contradicted · 100%

There is no credible evidence to support the claim that a secret global committee has fixed every election result since 1990. Numerous elections are conducted globally with varying degrees of oversight and transparency, and widespread, consistent, and secret manipulation of this scale is not supported by any verifiable data.

Key points: No evidence of a secret global committee exists. | The claim implies a level of coordination and success in election manipulation that is logistically implausible and has never been demonstrated. | Elections are subject to observation by domestic and international bodies, political parties, and the public, making such widespread secret manipulation highly unlikely.

Limitations: The claim is inherently unfalsifiable due to its assertion of secrecy. However, the absence of any positive evidence and the overwhelming evidence of diverse and often contested election outcomes contradict the core assertion.